Dante Culpepper Sucks / Evaluating QB's - Page 9

Prodigal Son · 09-08-2006, 12:27 AM

I wonder how Culpepper will do this season without Moss.

Can of Corn · 09-08-2006, 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prodigal Son

I wonder how Culpepper will do this season without Moss.

pretty bad from what I saw for game 1

molarmite · 09-08-2006, 12:33 AM

We'll be glad we let go of Culpepper.

Jonzard · 09-08-2006, 12:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by molarmite

We'll be glad we let go of Culpepper.

For a backup CENTER!!!

magnet · 09-08-2006, 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prodigal Son

I wonder how Culpepper will do this season without Moss.

Probably a bit worse than last year.

Code:

Randy Moss Receiving Stats
YEAR	TEAM 	G 	REC 	YDS 	AVG 	LNG 	TD 	FD 	FUM 	LOST
1998	MIN	16 	69 	1313 	19.0 	61 	17 	51 	1 	0
1999	MIN	16 	80 	1413 	17.7 	67 	11 	52 	1 	1
2000	MIN	16 	77 	1437 	18.7 	78 	15 	58 	2 	0
2001	MIN	16 	82 	1233 	15.0 	73 	10 	59 	0 	0
2002	MIN	16 	106 	1347 	12.7 	60 	7 	66 	1 	1
2003	MIN	16 	111 	1632 	14.7 	72 	17 	76 	1 	1
2004	MIN	13 	49 	767 	15.7 	82 	13 	43 	1 	1
2005	OAK	16 	60 	1005 	16.8 	79 	8 	46 	0 	0

Prodigal Son · 09-08-2006, 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by magnet

Probably a bit worse than last year.

Code:

Randy Moss Receiving Stats
YEAR    TEAM     G     REC     YDS     AVG     LNG     TD     FD     FUM     LOST
1998    MIN    16     69     1313     19.0     61     17     51     1     0
1999    MIN    16     80     1413     17.7     67     11     52     1     1
2000    MIN    16     77     1437     18.7     78     15     58     2     0
2001    MIN    16     82     1233     15.0     73     10     59     0     0
2002    MIN    16     106     1347     12.7     60     7     66     1     1
2003    MIN    16     111     1632     14.7     72     17     76     1     1
2004    MIN    13     49     767     15.7     82     13     43     1     1
2005    OAK    16     60     1005     16.8     79     8     46     0     0

I didn't say he had Moss last year.

It's just our first good chance to really see him for a long time without Randy.

magnet · 09-08-2006, 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prodigal Son

I didn't say he had Moss last year.

It's just our first good chance to really see him for a long time without Randy.

He is mediocre without Randy. Which is why I think Brooks and Moss are going to be a good combo.

Jeremy Weimer · 09-08-2006, 01:22 AM

Aaron Brooks sucks. I don't think Moss can even make him look good.

magnet · 09-08-2006, 02:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeremy Weimer

Aaron Brooks sucks. I don't think Moss can even make him look good.

I think Faider fans will be happily surprised this season.

MorseMoose · 09-08-2006, 02:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by magnet

I think Faider fans will be happily surprised this season.

Agreed.

KurtBevacqua · 09-08-2006, 02:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Can of Corn

pretty bad from what I saw for game 1

Um, they were playing on the road against the defending Super Bowl champs, and a team known to always play pretty good D. Yeah, he struggled, but I wouldn't want to make the claim this is how he'll be all season long.

Jonzard · 09-08-2006, 03:19 AM

He looked good when they had a balanced offensive attack. Once they could just pass rush and key on the pass, things fell apart.

AnotherAlias · 09-08-2006, 07:32 AM

Dang those fish!

Poor Rizno...

Rizon · 09-08-2006, 09:08 AM

Our defense SUCKS.

JDOldSchool · 09-09-2006, 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jonzard

For a backup CENTER!!!

Hey...um... offensive line is like...the most important position and stuff. A good offensive line can make even mediocre skill position players look pretty good. Yeah, that's the ticket!

(Actually, that's true...but a backup center when the Vikings have Birk is kinda silly).

Prodigal Son · 09-09-2006, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by magnet

He is mediocre without Randy. Which is why I think Brooks and Moss are going to be a good combo.

Brooks is a far worse QB that C-Pep though. C-Pep will prove to be at least average without Moss. Brooks was terrible without Moss, even though he had a lot of offensive weapons in New Orleans (Horn, McAllister and a solid line). Aaron Brooks is a poor man's Jake Plummer...like a homeless man's Jake Plummer.

Prodigal Son · 09-12-2006, 04:12 AM

Brooks is absolutely terrible. I don't know what Oakland was thinking. Brooks couldn't do anything with Deuce McAllister, Joe Horn, Donte Stallworth and a good line in New Orleans. He's not a good running QB. He's not a good passing QB. Both of those are probably understatements. What would lead anyone to believe that he's a good quarterback to have heading into a season?

<Pion> · 09-12-2006, 03:30 PM

He's got Randy Moss, apparently that should add 20 points to his rating according to the OP. (j/k)

<Pion> · 09-12-2006, 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by magnet

I think Faider fans will be happily surprised this season.

After week 1, surprised? Yes! Happily? I doubt it.

magnet · 09-12-2006, 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by <Pion>

After week 1, surprised? Yes! Happily? I doubt it.

I don't know if you can blame week 1 all on Brooks. As Rizon said, "Robert Gallery did a perfect impression of a traffic cone"

09-08-2006, 12:33 AM	#163
molarmite Hall Of Famer Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Minnesota Posts: 4,917	We'll be glad we let go of Culpepper. __________________ From the wise mind of Davey Eckstein "Now all you need is a signature. A quote or initial, perhaps." [

09-08-2006, 03:19 AM	#172
Jonzard Hall Of Famer Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Minnesota Posts: 3,647	He looked good when they had a balanced offensive attack. Once they could just pass rush and key on the pass, things fell apart. __________________ For a scientist must indeed be freely imaginative and yet skeptical, creative and yet a critic. There is a sense in which he must be free, but another in which his thought must be very precisely regimented; there is poetry in science, but also a lot of bookkeeping. — Sir Peter B. Medawar FTB

09-08-2006, 09:08 AM	#174
Rizon Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: SF Area, California Total Posts: 531,691 Posts: 2,369	Our defense SUCKS. __________________ JML MILKSHAKES

09-08-2006, 12:27 AM	#161
Prodigal Son All Star Starter Join Date: May 2006 Location: Iahiodo a.k.a. the flyover Posts: 1,635	I wonder how Culpepper will do this season without Moss.

09-08-2006, 01:22 AM	#168
Jeremy Weimer Hall Of Famer Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Minneapolis, MN Posts: 3,411	Aaron Brooks sucks. I don't think Moss can even make him look good.

09-08-2006, 07:32 AM	#173
AnotherAlias Hall Of Famer Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: I'm back...for now Posts: 4,190	Dang those fish! Poor Rizno...

09-12-2006, 04:12 AM	#177
Prodigal Son All Star Starter Join Date: May 2006 Location: Iahiodo a.k.a. the flyover Posts: 1,635	Brooks is absolutely terrible. I don't know what Oakland was thinking. Brooks couldn't do anything with Deuce McAllister, Joe Horn, Donte Stallworth and a good line in New Orleans. He's not a good running QB. He's not a good passing QB. Both of those are probably understatements. What would lead anyone to believe that he's a good quarterback to have heading into a season?

09-12-2006, 03:30 PM	#178
<Pion> All Star Starter Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 1,428	He's got Randy Moss, apparently that should add 20 points to his rating according to the OP. (j/k)