|
||||
| ||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,107
|
Contract Bug
Offering a contract to an angry player (just to see what would happen) and I stumbled upon this bug:
![]() But I didn't think he was on waivers: ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In The Moment
Posts: 14,224
|
I don't see a problem.
1. Why would you offer a contract to a player who doesn't require one? 2. Why would you offer a contract to a player on waivers, given that he could be picked up by another team? Last edited by Bluenoser; 12-22-2011 at 06:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,107
|
uggghh....My point is that he's NOT on waivers, yet it is saying I cannot offer him a contract because he is. You have to look before you simply just challenge anything and everything I might say or suggest. Not sure why you are, but you seem to have an issue with anything I present here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,533
|
hit finish day and see if you still get this issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In The Moment
Posts: 14,224
|
He cleared waivers, but has he actually been removed from the waiver wire?
I understand you get touchy with those who don't agree with your every inuation of a problem. I'm trying to point out some obvious things here. Relax. I'll skip all further posts by you and save us both the grief. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,107
|
Sorry...I had placed him on waivers about a week or so ago, so that's why I feel it's an issue. In the screens above it also states he had cleared waivers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto ON by way of Glasgow UK
Posts: 15,629
|
It's clearly not a bug. Would a real GM do this?
__________________
Cheers RichW If you’re looking for a good cause to donate money to please consider a Donation to Parkinson’s Canada. It may help me have a better future and if not me, someone else. Thanks. “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,107
|
Do what?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 777
|
He is still on waivers, even though he has cleared, you have to remove him from waivers, it should let you do that, to offer him a contract.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto ON by way of Glasgow UK
Posts: 15,629
|
Offer a contract to a player he just put on waivers. I thought you were all about a realistic GM experience.
__________________
Cheers RichW If you’re looking for a good cause to donate money to please consider a Donation to Parkinson’s Canada. It may help me have a better future and if not me, someone else. Thanks. “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,107
|
but he has cleared waivers...what are you talking about? I was testing the game actually to see what his reaction would be to a contract offer since he's so angry. But that doesn't take away from the fact that he's cleared waiver, and is currently on a minor league roster. Why shouldn't I be able to offer a contract? If you look at the screen shots, it's plain to see he has already cleared waivers, and on a minor league roster.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,946
|
Is the player on your 40-man roster? If not I don't think you can offer him a ML contract.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,107
|
No, he's not..but the problem is that I cannot offer ANY kind of contract. When I hit the "offer extension" button, the message saying I can't offer a player on waivers a contract comes right up, with no options to change the contract type. This is clearly a bug.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,107
|
Here it is again:
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,107
|
It appears to be a problem with any players who has been on waivers...even if they cleared long ago. This needs to be fixed, as it's pretty serious I think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,107
|
I found a temporary workaround for now, but it also raises a new question. If I remove all players who have ever cleared waivers from the "waivers" section of the "Transactions Screen" (waivers & DFA) I can then offer the players' contracts. The AI however does not do this. It allows all players who have ever cleared waivers to sit there. (which shouldn't be a problem, but now is for some reason) So my question is: Would an AI team be able to offer contracts' to these players if it wanted to?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,107
|
I have now even used commissioner mode to act as another team and offer a player who has cleared waivers a contract..same problem. I hope we can get this fixed. I don't remember this being present in the past.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Iberia, Louisiana
Posts: 869
|
Personally, I think that a player who clears waivers should just automatically be removed as soon as he clears..no reason for him to stay on there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,107
|
well, he isn't really on waivers anymore, he's just in that list where it says "cleared" next to the player's name. It IS clear however, that the Ai is mistaking a player who is in this box for being on waivers when it comes to the offering of a contract..which isn't good
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto ON by way of Glasgow UK
Posts: 15,629
|
Quote:
__________________
Cheers RichW If you’re looking for a good cause to donate money to please consider a Donation to Parkinson’s Canada. It may help me have a better future and if not me, someone else. Thanks. “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|