|
||||
|
|
OOTP 21- New to the Game? If you have basic questions about the the latest version of our game, please come here! |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Tököl, Hungary
Posts: 193
|
Mystery guys
Hi Fellows!
I am just curious your opinion. I have these two guys on my team, and I just can't figure them out. Delgado should be a solid major league player by his ratings and still his offensive performance is way below acceptable level. I know that only 10 games played in the season and from 10 games it is hard to tell any kind of statistic, but can we say that this guy is right now struggling, and we can hope he will improve? ![]() Then there is Walton, I got him from Oklahoma City where he had .364 AVG and .364 OBP in 11 PA. As you can see in our team he has .000 in 4 PA. ![]() ![]() I really want to improve the team's batting average and OBP, but I guess that there is not any strategy or other kind of setting by which I can achieve this. Strategy does not start working until a player gets on base. Or is there any way to instruct a guy with high gap power to aim for the gaps and try not to hit flyball? ![]() Last edited by Andrej72; 12-07-2020 at 01:57 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Ban land in 3...2...
Posts: 2,943
|
It's no mystery
It takes A LOT more playing time that 1 or 10 games Quote:
This data, of course, is for major league baseball, not for OOTP. One could do their own analysis of OOTP if they wanted. My guess is that the split-half correlations would be higher (fewer PA's) in OOTP. But that's a guess. But they still wouldn't be anything like what you list for the above players Focus on playing players with high contact and eye ratings Quote:
You may be able to get hitting coaches who focus on contact or patience. But the effects of this will 1) be subtle 2) take years, not a few games because those coaches will influence your prospects' hitting development. Your major league hitting coach should also have some effect, but, again, it will be subtle. Last edited by CBeisbol; 12-07-2020 at 06:51 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Tököl, Hungary
Posts: 193
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Ban land in 3...2...
Posts: 2,943
|
Quote:
The batting statistics will mean next to nothing until there are a few hundred or more plate appearances. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Tököl, Hungary
Posts: 193
|
So one more thing then. If I understand correctly I do not really have any influnce whatsoever on a batter when he steps up to the plate. Only "God" knows if it will be a base hit or a fly out, right?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Ban land in 3...2...
Posts: 2,943
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,640
|
Always focus on player ratings and not statistics. A player's compiled statistics in OOTP are only a measure of past results, and as CBeisbol has said, you need a LOT of statistics before you can draw a valid conclusion.
Players will have slumps, streaks, and will sometimes underperform or overperform compared to your expectations. This can happen over an entire season too, especially due to statistical probabilities and randomness. There are standard variations that seem extreme to an observer, but they are within the realm of normal statistical probabilities. For example, a player whose ratings indicate that he should probably hit .300 might only hit .275 for a season because he goes through a long slump. We see these fluctuations in real life all the time, and when they happen in OOTP, they can be frustrating, but they are normal. Here's a good example. I have a CF in my fictional league who had an amazing season one year ago. He hit far better than his ratings would indicate and finished in the top 5 in batting average despite only having a 6 contact rating on a 10-point scale. At one point he was hitting around .383 and still finished around .350. He was going to be a free agent, so I rewarded him with an expensive long-term contract extension. Then he started the first month of his second season hitting an abysmal .150 to .170. He was cold and slumping for the first few weeks. I kept him out of the lineup on occasion or dropped him to the bottom of the lineup because he was doing so poorly. I even tried to trade him away and no one would take him. But I kept giving him chances, and suddenly he has been on an amazing streak and is now hitting a bit over .300 for the season, only two weeks after he was barely hitting .200. Be patient and keep playing or simulating games. Eventually a player's ratings will usually win out. But it's perfectly acceptable to bench a player or take him out of your pitching rotation or bullpen if it seems like he's in a bad slump and you want to minimize damage. You can do something like I did and give him chances to break out of the slump without playing him as a regular. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Bat Boy
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 8
|
I also have a struggling slugger in Twins simulation that I am doing. Miguel Sano has a 39% strike out rate and a 78 OPS+. I looked into somehow tinkering with his strategies with no affect. I have simply moved him down the line up to at least reduce the amount of at bats. Like real baseball , he is just going to struggle. Hopefully he may have an uptick come play off time but I will simply play others up the line up that are producing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Tököl, Hungary
Posts: 193
|
Quote:
As for pitching, if I look ERA it is nothing impressive, but pitching WAR and FIP indicate that in fact our pitching performance is not bad at all, so I would conclude that relatively higher ERA is the consequence of bad fielding performance, if I am not mistaken. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Ban land in 3...2...
Posts: 2,943
|
Quote:
Get better base runners is one way. But then you have to balance getting good base runners with getting good hitters. It can be hard to find players that are both. If you take a base runner whom is producing 10 runs by base running, but -10 runs by batting and replace them with a better who produces 10 runs by batting but loses 5 runs base running, your team is better off, even if your base running is worse. This is the whole game. Balancing a weakness in one area with a strength in another. The other way is to pay careful attention to your base running strategy sliders. Are your base runners running too much? Not enough? Are your base runners attempting too many steals? Not enough? Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,640
|
Quote:
If you play out games, you will see slow and poor baserunners cause a lot of double plays as a runner or hitter, and they'll get thrown out again and again. They limit offense and end rallies far too often, so it's often better to find a comparable player who runs the bases better. As a good example, I had a RF on my current team who was a very good defender and batter, but he was really poor on the base paths. After watching him end or reduce rallies again and again through double plays, I traded him away for a comparable player with average baserunning. That alone has made a major difference, and now when my team plays against him, he hits pretty well against us, but he ends up in a lot of double plays and sometimes two in a game. Meanwhile, his replacement has clearly given us better overall production due to his better baserunning, even though his baserunning ratings are still only average. But average is a lot better than garbage. ![]() Last edited by Charlie Hough; 12-07-2020 at 06:07 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2016
Location: St Petersburg Florida USA
Posts: 6,657
Infractions: 0/2 (3)
|
This applies when 100% accurate ratings are used. Some consideration should be given to statistics when realistic scouting is used. How much depends on the setting for scouting accuracy.
AI managers do this. Consider the default setting for AI reliance on ratings, this year stats, last year stats, two years ago stats. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Tököl, Hungary
Posts: 193
|
After complaining about low AVG and low OBP a hit galore game came against the Buckeyes. Everybody in the starting lineup scored at least one hit. :-) Pitching was also pretty solid, end rotation lefty Robby Sadowski had a decent outing. Working 7 innings he allowed 2 runs on 5 hits, while struck out 5 and walked 2. Chris Crane closed the game without any problems.
![]() ![]() Last edited by Andrej72; 12-08-2020 at 03:38 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Tököl, Hungary
Posts: 193
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Tököl, Hungary
Posts: 193
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,640
|
Quote:
Also, I don't remember if it's included and calculated in OOTP, but there is a sabermetric statistic called Ultimate Base Running (UBR) that tries to measure how many runs a player adds or substracts for his team based on his baserunning. If OOTP uses it, then that's another relevant stat you can reference. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Tököl, Hungary
Posts: 193
|
That guy is a good base runner by his ratings, and still his UBR is -0.7 at the moment.
![]() Last edited by Andrej72; 12-09-2020 at 03:57 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Ban land in 3...2...
Posts: 2,943
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Tököl, Hungary
Posts: 193
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Ban land in 3...2...
Posts: 2,943
|
Quote:
These "projections" aren't really projections They are just the current season stats prorated to a full season. You've played about 1/12 of the season, so it should show a "projection" of (-.7 * 12) -8.4. But that would not be the number you'd expect at the end of the season. Only if the next 148 games were exactly like the 14 games the player has already played. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|