3137 - Top Systems Report not ranking correctly?

CHCfan · 03-26-2007, 08:05 PM

Here's my Top Systems report. The team at the bottom actually has a player in the top 100, albeit the 99th best prospect. Even if the algorithm doesn't count prospects so low on the list (my guess), it should at least recognize that a team with a low-ranked prospect should be higher than a team(s) with 0 ranked prospects. Anyone else see this?

bp_ · 03-26-2007, 08:20 PM

TT# 3137

Thanks for reporting this. I've been simming for a bit trying to see if I can replicate but I haven't seen this yet. Still, deserves a TT.

crafty35a · 03-26-2007, 09:51 PM

My guess is that the algorithm takes into account more players than just the top 100. So maybe Tacoma has top prospects #101, and 102, while Yakima has #99 and their next best prospect is #200.

CHCfan · 03-26-2007, 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crafty35a

My guess is that the algorithm takes into account more players than just the top 100. So maybe Tacoma has top prospects #101, and 102, while Yakima has #99 and their next best prospect is #200.

That's a possibilty. If it is considering non-100 players (as it should), there should be some way of making the list still make sense, perhaps listing the non-100 players it's considering in addition to the ranked players.

Nutlaw · 04-06-2007, 09:02 PM

This was claimed fixed in the first patch. If you continue to have trouble with this issue, please contact a moderator to reopen this thread.

03-26-2007, 08:05 PM	#1
CHCfan All Star Starter Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Grand Island, NE Posts: 1,117	3137 - Top Systems Report not ranking correctly? Here's my Top Systems report. The team at the bottom actually has a player in the top 100, albeit the 99th best prospect. Even if the algorithm doesn't count prospects so low on the list (my guess), it should at least recognize that a team with a low-ranked prospect should be higher than a team(s) with 0 ranked prospects. Anyone else see this? Attached Images

03-26-2007, 08:20 PM	#2
bp_ Hall Of Famer Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: New York, NY Posts: 2,804 Blog Entries: 1	TT# 3137 Thanks for reporting this. I've been simming for a bit trying to see if I can replicate but I haven't seen this yet. Still, deserves a TT. __________________ Commish: Over The Mound

03-26-2007, 09:51 PM	#3
crafty35a Minors (Rookie Ball) Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 45	My guess is that the algorithm takes into account more players than just the top 100. So maybe Tacoma has top prospects #101, and 102, while Yakima has #99 and their next best prospect is #200.

04-06-2007, 09:02 PM	#5
Nutlaw Hall Of Famer Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 9,538	This was claimed fixed in the first patch. If you continue to have trouble with this issue, please contact a moderator to reopen this thread.