|
||||
| ||||
|
|||||||
| Suggestions for Future OOTP Versions Post suggestions for the next version of Out of the Park Baseball here! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Dec 2024
Posts: 118
|
Suggestion: Add a Midseason “Second Half Perfect Team” Fresh-Start Option
I’d like to suggest that OOTP consider adding an optional midseason Perfect Team fresh-start mode, perhaps beginning around the All-Star break.
One of the most enjoyable parts of Perfect Team is the first few months: building from scratch, opening packs that can actually change your roster, finding market bargains, completing early missions, and making meaningful decisions with limited resources. For many free-to-play and moderate-spending players, that early roster-building phase is the most engaging part of the mode. By midseason, however, many teams hit a wall. The affordable upgrade pool becomes very thin, many useful cards are locked behind very high prices, and meaningful improvements often require six-figure or seven-figure PP purchases. At that point, a lot of players may continue logging in, but the sense of active team-building slows down. A possible solution would be an optional Second Half Perfect Team mode: It would start fresh after the All-Star break. It would use a separate team and separate economy from the main PT team. The original PT season would continue normally for players who want to stay focused on their existing teams. The second-half mode could have its own ladder, missions, achievements, and championships. Rewards could be modest and separate, or perhaps include limited crossover rewards such as packs, cosmetics, or small bonuses. I think this could benefit several types of players. For free-to-play players, it would bring back the most fun part of the game: building a roster from nothing and making every card matter again. For competitive spenders, it would create a second launch-style race during the year. Some players would likely spend again to chase the new ladder, new missions, and new championships. For OOTP, it could create a second wave of engagement and revenue at a point in the cycle when some players otherwise begin drifting away or simply waiting for the next version. The key would be making it optional and separate, so it does not invalidate the original PT season. Players who love their main teams can keep playing them, while players who miss the early-build experience have a reason to re-engage. In short, a midseason fresh-start PT option could give the game a second burst of energy, give free-to-play players another meaningful building phase, and potentially create a new revenue opportunity without taking anything away from the existing PT structure. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Dec 2024
Posts: 118
|
Update to my original post
Moving into Week 16, my two PT27 teams have hit the F2P “wall.”
Good planning without spending money can take you a long way, but eventually it severely limits the possibilities. This is why I came up with the idea of a “second chance” restart around the MLB All-Star break. Earlier in the cycle, a smart F2P build can out-engineer sloppy spenders and weaker teams. But once the pyramid compresses upward, High Gold and Low Diamond stop being just “good roster” tiers and start becoming places where you regularly run into: > whale rosters that failed upward or downward temporarily, > partial whale teams that are still vastly deeper than F2P teams, > auction-house grinders with huge PP banks, > and very optimized F2P/low-spend teams fighting for the same survival space. HG+ = roughly the top 10% of teams LD+ = roughly the top 5% of teams My two teams are probably already sitting in that upper F2P band. The problem is that the next step is no longer just “make better decisions.” It becomes: Can you close a spending-created talent gap across 26 roster spots? And usually the answer is: not consistently, unless you get pack luck, mission luck, or find a major market mistake you can exploit. Team 1 is an example. That team did almost everything right in Low Gold: elite offense, elite run prevention, elite defense, elite efficiency. That means the build concept worked. But now the High Gold draw is saying: “Nice roster — now play four teams with 90+ ratings and a 97.” That is not a normal baseball problem. That is an ecosystem problem. Team 2 is similar. A +44 run differential in Low Diamond says the team belonged. But if the new division is 78 / 91 / 93 / 90 / 88, even survival becomes hard labor. You can improve the bullpen, but one better reliever does not erase a 12-to-20 point team-rating gap across the league. Emotionally, this is where PT can stop feeling fun. Up to this point, the build improves, the team gets rewarded, and then the reward becomes getting fed to heavier wallets. Strategically, though, this is not failure. This is the natural F2P plateau: Team 1 around the High Gold/Low Diamond border, Team 2 as a Low Diamond survivor candidate, both needing either one enormous upgrade or lucky pulls to move materially higher. Sure, a lottery pack win could change the fortunes of either team. In the past, I usually rode out the season until the holidays hoping that the “Babe Ruth” card would finally show up. But when I balance that possible reward against the chore and time invested in waiting for it, it simply is not worth it. July becomes the time to move on to other projects. This is exactly where the idea of a “second chance restart” would be a breath of fresh air in Perfect Team — both for F2P players and for spenders who might also enjoy experiencing the early growth curve again without losing their original teams. I have no idea whether something like this can be built, or whether it would be financially practical. But the current structure, after the All-Star break, only provides continued interest to a small percentage of the 9000+ players who started the adventure back in March. A second-chance restart would solve a very real Perfect Team problem: once F2P teams hit the wallet ceiling, the game can turn from “build and compete” into “maintain and hope for pack luck.” The fun part of PT is the climb: Bronze/Silver/Gold roster engineering, finding undervalued cards, building around a park, solving missions, squeezing value out of imperfect rosters. Once you hit the spending wall, the challenge changes from strategy to resources, and that is a much less interesting game. A restart mode would bring back the best part without deleting the original team. Something like this: Perfect Team Second Chance / Midseason Reset You keep your main team intact, but you can start a new F2P-only or limited-spend roster in a parallel ladder. Everyone begins again with starter packs, low PP, and maybe some capped mission progress. It would run as a separate season path, perhaps from the All-Star break to the end of the MLB season. The key would be separating it from established whale economies. Something like: > New roster slot > Fresh auction economy or restricted card pool > No transferring PP or cards from the main team > Optional F2P-only or spending-capped ladder > Shorter season cycle > Rewards that help the restart team, not huge main-team advantages > Maybe themed eras or rotating card pools to keep it fresh That would give players a reason to keep engaging after the first major plateau. Right now, teams like mine are basically proof that you can do almost everything right and still reach a point where the next mountain is built out of other people’s spending power. Once the ecosystem compresses, the question becomes less “Can I outsmart the league?” and more “Can I survive long enough to get lucky?” A second-chance restart would restore the feeling of agency. It would let good team-builders start solving problems again instead of just checking standings and waiting for the next pack miracle. Let me close by emphasizing that I am not bad-mouthing whales. OOTP has to be profitable, and people willing to spend money to be successful have every right to do so. If 9,000 teams spent money to play Perfect Team, everything would be equal and the OOTP owners would be ecstatic — but that is not reality. Some people have the resources. Most do not. Finding a way to keep the bottom 85% engaged for the entire calendar year would be a good thing for F2P players, low-spend players, whales who enjoy fresh starts, and OOTP itself. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|